<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Burning Man Bursts Into Nevada</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.toonaripost.com/2011/09/life-style/burning-man-bursts-into-nevada/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.toonaripost.com/2011/09/life-style/burning-man-bursts-into-nevada/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=burning-man-bursts-into-nevada</link>
	<description>Grassroots Journalists, Bloggers and Experts capture and report news from around the world. Become a citizen journalist with Toonari Post today!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 12:38:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Holden</title>
		<link>http://www.toonaripost.com/2011/09/life-style/burning-man-bursts-into-nevada/#comment-1362</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Holden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 03:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toonaripost.com/?p=12791#comment-1362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The image on this page is not courtesy of Michael Holden when you crop his copyright notice out of the picture, it makes him reconsider why he releases his stuff under a creative commons license in the first place. This is extremely rude, violates the no derivative work clause of the creative commons license attached to the image and may be seen as evidence of willful infringement. Also, the credit goes next to the photo, not at the bottom of the article. Yeah, I know, bitch bitch bitch is all we photographers ever do. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The image on this page is not courtesy of Michael Holden when you crop his copyright notice out of the picture, it makes him reconsider why he releases his stuff under a creative commons license in the first place. This is extremely rude, violates the no derivative work clause of the creative commons license attached to the image and may be seen as evidence of willful infringement. Also, the credit goes next to the photo, not at the bottom of the article. Yeah, I know, bitch bitch bitch is all we photographers ever do. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
