<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are All Odds Against Obama in 2012?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.toonaripost.com/2011/09/us-news/are-all-odds-against-obama-in-2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.toonaripost.com/2011/09/us-news/are-all-odds-against-obama-in-2012/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=are-all-odds-against-obama-in-2012</link>
	<description>Grassroots Journalists, Bloggers and Experts capture and report news from around the world. Become a citizen journalist with Toonari Post today!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 08:44:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.toonaripost.com/2011/09/us-news/are-all-odds-against-obama-in-2012/#comment-11673</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 06:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toonaripost.com/?p=12736#comment-11673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The polls and the odds have a fundamental conflict.   I think it&#039;s because pollsters  like to use the best  turnout results from the last electtion.. Those results color the forecasts with a historic bias.  How can anyone correct for historical high turnout levels?  They can&#039;t.  Well, not without a crystal ball.  So 2012 polls are biased by the past.  Obama polls run hot because of that.  Romney voters probably won&#039;t poll hot for the same kinds of reasons.  So, Obama polls are better than expected...that would be another example of the power of incumbency.  I don&#039;t think odds makers work that way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The polls and the odds have a fundamental conflict.   I think it&#8217;s because pollsters  like to use the best  turnout results from the last electtion.. Those results color the forecasts with a historic bias.  How can anyone correct for historical high turnout levels?  They can&#8217;t.  Well, not without a crystal ball.  So 2012 polls are biased by the past.  Obama polls run hot because of that.  Romney voters probably won&#8217;t poll hot for the same kinds of reasons.  So, Obama polls are better than expected&#8230;that would be another example of the power of incumbency.  I don&#8217;t think odds makers work that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
