<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Republican Opinion, America Loses Election</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/11/featured/america-loses-election/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/11/featured/america-loses-election/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=america-loses-election</link>
	<description>Grassroots Journalists, Bloggers and Experts capture and report news from around the world. Become a citizen journalist with Toonari Post today!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 01:50:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kiara Ashanti</title>
		<link>http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/11/featured/america-loses-election/#comment-18668</link>
		<dc:creator>Kiara Ashanti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 04:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toonaripost.com/?p=89416#comment-18668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Q.

You are not thinking deep enough. Cancer should be covered. That is a health issue. Birth control is a choice. No one needs to have sex. But if they do have it, why cant a woman pay for her birth control pills?  Explain why they cannot even just pay a small co payment?  Is it more important than say cancer, where people do have a co -payment for drugs that keep them alive?

CBO was given a bill that did not have ALL the costs included in it, things like paying the doctors, duh?  When you add that in, then it is too expensive as even the CBO has said.

Lastly, tax cuts are not a cost. do the math, you do not send out a check to anyone when you cut tax rates. AND if you go to the irs you will see that the gov collected more tax revenue under Bush tax cuts than before they were enacted. And the same things happened under CLinton, Reagan, and Kennedy. all had lower tax rates.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q.</p>
<p>You are not thinking deep enough. Cancer should be covered. That is a health issue. Birth control is a choice. No one needs to have sex. But if they do have it, why cant a woman pay for her birth control pills?  Explain why they cannot even just pay a small co payment?  Is it more important than say cancer, where people do have a co -payment for drugs that keep them alive?</p>
<p>CBO was given a bill that did not have ALL the costs included in it, things like paying the doctors, duh?  When you add that in, then it is too expensive as even the CBO has said.</p>
<p>Lastly, tax cuts are not a cost. do the math, you do not send out a check to anyone when you cut tax rates. AND if you go to the irs you will see that the gov collected more tax revenue under Bush tax cuts than before they were enacted. And the same things happened under CLinton, Reagan, and Kennedy. all had lower tax rates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Q.</title>
		<link>http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/11/featured/america-loses-election/#comment-18608</link>
		<dc:creator>Q.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 16:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toonaripost.com/?p=89416#comment-18608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Deficit hawks have been warning about inflation and higher borrowing costs for DECADES, but they never arrive. In fact, interest on U.S. loans is lower than ever.

The fuss over women&#039;s contraception is ridiculous. all women are asking is that birth control be covered by employers&#039; health insurance because it&#039;s a health issue that should be covered by health insurance. 

It&#039;s funny that those on the right didn&#039;t worry about the debt or the deficit when they launched two wars with borrowed money or passed the Bush tax cuts with the old dogma &quot;tax cuts pay for themselves&quot;.

The CBO has predicted that Obama&#039;s Affordable Care Act will bring down health care costs over time. We&#039;ll see if in 4 years]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deficit hawks have been warning about inflation and higher borrowing costs for DECADES, but they never arrive. In fact, interest on U.S. loans is lower than ever.</p>
<p>The fuss over women&#8217;s contraception is ridiculous. all women are asking is that birth control be covered by employers&#8217; health insurance because it&#8217;s a health issue that should be covered by health insurance. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s funny that those on the right didn&#8217;t worry about the debt or the deficit when they launched two wars with borrowed money or passed the Bush tax cuts with the old dogma &#8220;tax cuts pay for themselves&#8221;.</p>
<p>The CBO has predicted that Obama&#8217;s Affordable Care Act will bring down health care costs over time. We&#8217;ll see if in 4 years</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ginger Spelts</title>
		<link>http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/11/featured/america-loses-election/#comment-15641</link>
		<dc:creator>Ginger Spelts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 22:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toonaripost.com/?p=89416#comment-15641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent article. Unfortunately its the truth.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article. Unfortunately its the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/11/featured/america-loses-election/#comment-15631</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 18:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toonaripost.com/?p=89416#comment-15631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just had a nosey at that article too... got to be said, if that&#039;s republican maths, they&#039;re buggered! 101% of 50k is $50,500 not $5000000. Basic, simple maths! It&#039;s really not rocket science.  

I don&#039;t think I could ever vote Repulican... they just make me giggle!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just had a nosey at that article too&#8230; got to be said, if that&#8217;s republican maths, they&#8217;re buggered! 101% of 50k is $50,500 not $5000000. Basic, simple maths! It&#8217;s really not rocket science.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think I could ever vote Repulican&#8230; they just make me giggle!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
