Airport security has always been a headache, especially after 9/11. The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) advices to arrive at the airport a few hours prior flights, ensuring sufficient time at hand to pass through security checkpoints.

The process of removing shoes, jackets, metals as well as removing laptops and the quart-sized bag of liquids may be a hassle but is essential to everyone’s safety. With thousands of passengers passing through checkpoint, sometimes people’s experiences are not the best. However, some of the cases below to hit media are far from a “bad day.” These cases bring light in whether U.S. flight security too much or not enough.

On June 24, Olajide Noibi got on the Virgin America Flight 415 at JFK Airport with no ID and an expired boarding pass that did not belong to him. Even though he was caught on the flight, he was able to walk off the plane and spend several days in the Los Angeles area until Wednesday, June 29, when Noibi tried to board a Delta flight for Atlanta, again with an expired boarding pass in another name and no valid ID.

After searching his bag, authorities found about ten other expired boarding passes, none of which were in his name. Olajide was taken into custody at LAX on June 29 and was charged with being a stowaway. He will be fined and could even face jail time. He had gotten through security at JFK with a University of Michigan student ID and a police report saying his passport was stolen. He was even subjected to screening at checkpoint, and yet he still managed to board.

This incident is another in a string of TSA mishaps with the pat-down techniques and full body scans. TSA had strengthened security after 9/11, in hopes to prevent future terrorist attacks. Since 2001, there have been many cases where the agency has been at fault for their security measures. Recently, TSA’s definition of the types of people targeted for pat-downs have gotten out of hand.

Last month TSA’s actions against one passenger raised questions as to how far this agency can go before they are stopped. A few agents stopped a 95-year-old woman, wheelchair-bound with final-stage Leukemia and forced her to take off her adult diaper for pat-down purposes. Jean Weber, daughter of the woman, described the incident.

“My mother was first pulled aside into a glass-partitioned area and patted down. Then she was taken to another room to protect her privacy during a more extensive search,” Weber said. “Security personnel came out and told me that they would need for her mother to remove her Depends diaper because it was impeding their search.”

When asked to comment, TSA spokespersons simply said “the procedures are the same for everyone to ensure national security.”

If there is a record for “youngest child to get a pat down,” then this child wins. According to Kansas City Star, a picture was tweeted by Rev. Jacob Jester of Independence, Mo of an eight-month old baby getting a pat down.

“An 8-month-old doesn’t pose a threat to an airplane or national security. I am grateful for TSA’s willingness and desire to protect, but I believe in this instance that was extreme,” Jester said.

Though these cases show that TSA security precautions are a bit extreme, if not for these measures in the first place, then our nation’s safety may be at risk.

According to TSA’s official website, the primary goal is to treat all passengers with courtesy, dignity, and respect during the security screening processes. In order to do so, security officers are trained in the proper treatment of passengers and their belongings and are required to search all belongings.

This method includes walking through a metal detector and a possible pat-down or full body scan. All of these procedures are in place to ensure the safety of passengers, pilots, and anyone else who travels on airplanes.

Is the flight security too much or too little? Are the incidences previously mentioned a reason to relook the security procedures? Clearly, no one wants a repeat of 9/11 or any other future potential terrorist attacks. Yet, it seems that whichever method this nation uses to protect the citizens’ safety, it will be taken into question.

The article Is There Too Much Flight Security in the US? appeared first on The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!.

Just because you haven’t heard much about it does not mean it has gone away. Airport security in the United States still sucks. For some reason, the Transportation Security Administration continues to hire minimum wage inexperienced lackeys that do not have the critical skill of common sense. And they cannot admit when they are wrong.

A Florida woman complained over the weekend after her 95-year old mother was forced by security personnel to remove her adult diaper. The TSA released a statement Sunday defending its agents’ actions at the Destin-Fort Walton Beach Airport. “While every person and item must be screened before entering the secure boarding area, TSA works with passengers to resolve security alarms in a respectful and sensitive manner,” the federal agency said. “We have reviewed the circumstances involving this screening and determined that our officers acted professionally and according to proper procedure.”

Jean Weber told news outlets on Sunday that the security officers may have been procedurally correct to search her mother who has cancer, but she still does not believe they were justified, especially given her mother’s frail condition.”If this is your procedure — which I do understand — I also feel that your procedure needs to be changed,” she said.

Weber said the two were traveling June 18 from northwest Florida to Michigan, so her mother could move in with relatives before eventually going to an assisted living facility. “My mother is very ill, she has a form of leukemia,” Weber said. “She had a blood transfusion the week before, just to bolster up her strength for this travel.”

Weber’s mother was taken by a TSA officer into a glassed-in area and received a pat down, according to Weber. An agent stated that “they felt something suspicious on (her mother’s) leg and they couldn’t determine what it was.” A TSA agent told Weber that her mother’s adult diaper could not be checked thoroughly. Weber and her mother left to find a bathroom at the TSA officer’s request to take off the adult diaper.

Airport security has been in the news often over the past year. Most recently, a video surfaced showing a 6-year old passenger being patted down last April. Although, just last year the TSA reported only children over the age of 12 would be subject to the screenings.

The TSA addressed this controversy at a Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee meeting last week, explaining the pat-down was ordered because the child had moved while passing through a body imaging machine. The next day, TSA spokesman Greg Soule said that the new policy — which will apply to children age 12 and younger — is in the process of being rolled out. It will give security officers “more options,” but does not eliminate pat-downs as one of them.

All of these reactive measures do not solve anything or prevent any further damages. Technology and invasive procedures are not a catch all. Common sense should prevail. A 6-year old girl or a 95-year old woman in a wheelchair probably should not be our targets. But, someone with a one-way ticket and no luggage should alert some astute security. It isn’t that way though. The TSA hires poorly trained individuals to follow a very specific guidelines, instead of using logic and rational. All the shoe removing, scanning, and pat-downs isn’t going to help if security does not use their brains.

The article TSA Pat Downs 95-Year Old Woman-Have the Terrorists Won? appeared first on The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!.