<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People! &#187; Harris Interactive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.toonaripost.com/tag/harris-interactive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.toonaripost.com</link>
	<description>Grassroots Journalists, Bloggers and Experts capture and report news from around the world. Become a citizen journalist with Toonari Post today!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:00:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Over 38 Million Americans Shop On the Toilet, According to Survey</title>
		<link>http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/11/life-style/over-38-million-americans-shop-on-the-toilet-according-to-survey/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=over-38-million-americans-shop-on-the-toilet-according-to-survey</link>
		<comments>http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/11/life-style/over-38-million-americans-shop-on-the-toilet-according-to-survey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 16:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TP Team</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life Style]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CashStar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harris Interactive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holiday shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile eGift Cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Online Shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shopping trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shopping via mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphones and tablets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toonaripost.com/?p=90581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a></p><p>Portland, US.A. &#8212; The holiday shopping season is nearly in full swing and survey results announced by CashStar, the digital gifting and incentives company, show that online Americans are shopping from their mobile devices in mass numbers, sometimes from unexpected places. The survey found that more than 38 million online adult Americans admit to having shopped [...]</p></p><p>The article <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/11/life-style/over-38-million-americans-shop-on-the-toilet-according-to-survey/">Over 38 Million Americans Shop On the Toilet, According to Survey</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a></p><p>Portland, US.A. &#8212; The holiday shopping season is nearly in full swing and survey results announced by <a href="http://www.cashstar.com/" target="_blank">CashStar</a>, the digital gifting and incentives company, show that online Americans are shopping from their mobile devices in mass numbers, sometimes from unexpected places.</p>
<p>The survey found that more than 38 million online adult Americans admit to having shopped online while on the toilet. It also found that convergence is happening in unexpected ways with almost 17 million shopping via a mobile device while standing in the retailer&#8217;s physical store. The survey, which was conducted online nationwide by Harris Interactive on behalf of CashStar from November 6-8, 2012 among 2,104 U.S. online adults aged 18 and older, examined the strange or odd places U.S. adults have used computers or mobile devices to shop online.</p>
<p>&#8220;Smartphones and tablets have enabled consumers to shop and gift on-the-go in more ways and places than ever before,&#8221; said David Stone, co-founder and CEO of CashStar. &#8220;The retailers who have been paying attention and catering to where and how consumers want to shop by mobile-optimizing their e-commerce sites and offering mobile eGift Cards will reap the rewards this holiday season and have a jump on the competition going into 2013.</p>
<p>Retailers on the CashStar platform whose eGift Card website is optimized for mobile have seen 3,700 percent more sales from mobile devices this year than retailers whose sites are not mobile-optimized. Why? Because the experience is so much better, faster, and easier for consumers.&#8221;</p>
<p>The CashStar Mobile Online Shopping Survey also found some other surprising shopping trends:</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>The strangest places consumers have shopped? Bringing physical and online retail together – More west coasters indicated that they were inclined to do this than people in other regions of the country.
<ul type="circle">
<li>Do not disturb -Men were more inclined to shop while on the toilet than women.</li>
<li>Shopping and driving – Despite the danger, more than four million Americans have still shopped online while driving a car.</li>
<li>Just checking email at the conference table? – More than nine million Americans admitted they have secretly shopped while in a business meeting.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Milk, bread, and that new flat screen –More than seven million Americans have filled their grocery and online shopping carts at the same time; they have shopped from their mobile device while at the grocery store.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Survey Methodology</strong></p>
<p>This survey was conducted online within the United States by Harris Interactive on behalf of CashStar from November 6-8, 2012 among 2,104 adults ages 18 and older. This online survey is not based on a probability sample and therefore no estimate of theoretical sampling error can be calculated. Calculation based on U.S. Census Bureau&#8217;s 2011 Census, which estimates there are 237,744,632 million adults ages 18+ residing in the United States: 237.7M  x  0.16 = 38M have shopped online while on the toilet</p>
<p>The article <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/11/life-style/over-38-million-americans-shop-on-the-toilet-according-to-survey/">Over 38 Million Americans Shop On the Toilet, According to Survey</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/11/life-style/over-38-million-americans-shop-on-the-toilet-according-to-survey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three in Five Commuters Experience Road Rage</title>
		<link>http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/07/life-style/three-in-five-commuters-experience-road-rage/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=three-in-five-commuters-experience-road-rage</link>
		<comments>http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/07/life-style/three-in-five-commuters-experience-road-rage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 14:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TP Newswire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life Style]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benefits of telecommuting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[career builder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commuting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commuting to work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harris Interactive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how to prevent road rage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[road rage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[road rage commuters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summer commute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecommuting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texting while driving]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toonaripost.com/?p=65202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a></p><p>Chicago, U.S.A. &#8212; A new study from CareerBuilder shows workers may have more than heavy traffic to contend with on their way to work. Fifty-eight percent of workers who drive to work said they experience road rage at times while traveling to and from the office, similar to findings in 2006 when the study was [...]</p></p><p>The article <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/07/life-style/three-in-five-commuters-experience-road-rage/">Three in Five Commuters Experience Road Rage</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a></p><p>Chicago, U.S.A. &#8212; A new study from CareerBuilder shows workers may have more than heavy traffic to contend with on their way to work. Fifty-eight percent of workers who drive to work said they experience road rage at times while traveling to and from the office, similar to findings in 2006 when the study was last conducted. Nearly one-in-ten workers (9 percent) who drive to work have gotten into a fight with another commuter. The study was conducted online by Harris Interactive from May 14, 2012 to June 4, 2012 and included more than 3,800 workers nationwide.</p>
<p>The vast majority of workers (83 percent) said they typically drive to work and, of those, 12 percent reported they took a job with a longer commute during or post-recession. While incidents of road rage are more prevalent among those with lengthy commutes, workers with short trips to their jobs aren&#8217;t immune. Thirty-seven percent of workers with commutes of less than five minutes said they experience road rage from time to time. The same goes for 54 percent of workers with commutes of less than ten minutes.</p>
<p><strong>Gender and age comparisons</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>Women were more apt to feel road age – 61 percent compared to 56 percent of men. In terms of age groups, workers ages 25 to 34 were the most likely to experience road at 68 percent while workers 55 and older were the least likely to experience it at 47 percent.</p>
<p><strong>Texting on the road </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong>Nearly one-in-four workers (24 percent) who drive to work reported they have been involved in an accident. While a variety of factors contribute to accidents, cell phone use can be a culprit. Three-in-ten workers (30 percent) admitted they have texted while driving to and from work.</p>
<p><strong>Summer commutes </strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>Workers may have a more amicable commute over the summer months. While 10 percent of workers reported they tend to have more road rage in the summer, 17 percent tend to have less.</p>
<p>&#8220;Road rage is most often associated with running late and far commutes,&#8221; said Rosemary Haefner, Vice President of Human Resources at CareerBuilder. &#8220;Planning ahead and taking advantage of flexible work arrangements can help alleviate stress levels and set a more positive vibe for the workday.&#8221;</p>
<p>Haefner recommends the following tips for a calmer commute:</p>
<div style="padding-left:2.0em">
<ol type="1">
<li>Give yourself extra time.  Set out clothes and prepare lunches the night before. Set your alarm 15 minutes early to allow for any minor setbacks that can happen in a busy household.</li>
<li>Request flexible work arrangements. See if you can start work at an off-peak time to avoid rush hour or explore whether telecommuting may be an option.</li>
<li>Try easy listening. Whether it means soothing music, books on tape or your favorite morning news program, listen to something that can help you forget the hour-long delay you just encountered.</li>
<li>Consider public transportation. Taking a bus or train can free you to finish up work, read or just relax.</li>
</ol>
</div>
<p><strong>Methodology</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>This survey was conducted online within the U.S. by Harris Interactive on behalf of CareerBuilder among 3,892 U.S. workers (employed full-time, not self-employed, non-government) ages 18 and over between May 14 and June 4, 2012 (percentages for some questions are based on a subset, based on their responses to certain questions). With a pure probability sample of 3,892, one could say with a 95 percent probability that the overall results have a sampling error of +/-1.57 percentage points. Sampling error for data from sub-samples is higher and varies.</p>
<p>The article <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/07/life-style/three-in-five-commuters-experience-road-rage/">Three in Five Commuters Experience Road Rage</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/07/life-style/three-in-five-commuters-experience-road-rage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Celebrity Dermatologist Shares Tips to End Skincare Confusion</title>
		<link>http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/05/life-style/celebrity-dermatologist-shares-tips-to-end-skincare-confusion/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=celebrity-dermatologist-shares-tips-to-end-skincare-confusion</link>
		<comments>http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/05/life-style/celebrity-dermatologist-shares-tips-to-end-skincare-confusion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 20:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TP Newswire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life Style]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-aging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blotchy skin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dermatologics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr. Will Kirby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exfoliation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harris Interactive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Helioplex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neutrogena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[premature aging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retinol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retinol NX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toonaripost.com/?p=48208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a></p><p>Los Angeles, U.S.A - With summer just around the corner, there&#8217;s simply no time in busy schedules to stress over fine lines, wrinkles, and blotchy skin. According to a recent Neutrogena survey conducted by Harris Interactive, 45% of women are not sure about which products work best for their skin. To help take the guesswork out of [...]</p></p><p>The article <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/05/life-style/celebrity-dermatologist-shares-tips-to-end-skincare-confusion/">Celebrity Dermatologist Shares Tips to End Skincare Confusion</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a></p><p>Los Angeles, U.S.A - With summer just around the corner, there&#8217;s simply no time in busy schedules to stress over fine lines, wrinkles, and blotchy skin. According to a recent Neutrogena survey conducted by Harris Interactive, 45% of women are not sure about which products work best for their skin. To help take the guesswork out of summer skin care, Neutrogena Dermatologics and Dr. Will Kirby have teamed up to offer tips on skin care that delivers real results for younger-looking skin.</p>
<p>&#8220;My patients are always looking for anti-aging solutions but are often confused by all the choices out there. I always suggest a retinol based product because it&#8217;s clinically proven to be one of the most effective anti-aging ingredients in the market today, because it decreases the signs of aging,&#8221; said Dr. Will Kirby. &#8220;Retinol is a trusted anti-aging powerhouse ingredient that has long been a favorite of dermatologists and my personal go-to when advising my patients on what products to buy.&#8221;</p>
<p>While winter skin care may be all about fighting dry skin, when transitioning into summer, regular treatment and daily sun protection are key to uncovering noticeably younger-looking skin. Follow Dr. Kirby&#8217;s three simple tips to achieve healthy, younger-looking skin all season long:</p>
<div>
<ol start="1">
<li>Choose power-packed ingredients - The two must-have ingredients for an effective, but simple, anti-aging routine are stabilized retinol and broad spectrum sunscreen with Helioplex.  As sun damage is one of the major causes of wrinkles and premature aging, daily sun protection is critical.</li>
<li>Pick a superior formula for superior results - Although retinol is the gold standard of anti-aging, not all formulations with retinol are created equal. Many retinols break down in formulation due to exposure to light and air, so it is very important to look for a stabilized form of retinol. Neutrogena&#8217;s patented process of stabilizing retinol keeps it in its most effective form to deliver superior visible skin benefits.</li>
<li>Apply easily - Exfoliation not only sheds dull winter skin, but also provides a smoother canvas for makeup or self tanner. Apply a product such as Neutrogena<sup> </sup>Dermatologics Retinol NX Concentrated Retinol Serum, to help increase surface cell turnover while moisturizing emollients smooth skin for younger-looking skin. There&#8217;s no need to add an extra step to your busy summer schedules!</li>
</ol>
</div>
<p>The article <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/05/life-style/celebrity-dermatologist-shares-tips-to-end-skincare-confusion/">Celebrity Dermatologist Shares Tips to End Skincare Confusion</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/05/life-style/celebrity-dermatologist-shares-tips-to-end-skincare-confusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Do Americans Think About Iran&#8217;s Nuclear Threat?</title>
		<link>http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/04/us-news/what-do-americans-think-about-irans-nuclear-threat/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=what-do-americans-think-about-irans-nuclear-threat</link>
		<comments>http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/04/us-news/what-do-americans-think-about-irans-nuclear-threat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TP Newswire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harris Interactive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran Nuclear Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran nuclear threat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran nuclear weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[israel iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel vs Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Harris Poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Israel releations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toonaripost.com/?p=42156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a></p><p>As the United States has removed itself from one extended military conflict in the Middle East &#8211; in Iraq &#8211; another one possibly looms on the horizon, brought on by Iran&#8217;s suspected nuclear program and, among other things, Israel&#8217;s desire to abolish it. The U.S. has a tricky and nuanced road to navigate, made only more complicated by Israel&#8217;s role, the rising price of [...]</p></p><p>The article <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/04/us-news/what-do-americans-think-about-irans-nuclear-threat/">What Do Americans Think About Iran&#8217;s Nuclear Threat?</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a></p><p>As the United States has removed itself from one extended military conflict in the Middle East &#8211; in Iraq &#8211; another one possibly looms on the horizon, brought on by Iran&#8217;s suspected nuclear program and, among other things, Israel&#8217;s desire to abolish it. The U.S. has a tricky and nuanced road to navigate, made only more complicated by Israel&#8217;s role, the rising price of oil, and the presidential election in November. When Americans were asked about various items related to the potential conflict with Iran, the responses reflect the complicated nature of the issue.  Seven in ten Americans agree that Iran&#8217;s nuclear capabilities pose a threat to the United States (72%), yet what action the United States should take in response is less clear.</p>
<p>Over half of U.S. adults say that if Israel takes action against Iran&#8217;s nuclear program that the U.S. should support Israel (56%), yet fewer than half of Americans say Israel should take action to destroy Iran&#8217;s nuclear program (45%) and fewer believe that the U.S. should take this action themselves.</p>
<p>These are some of the results of The Harris Poll of 2,451 adults surveyed online between March 12 and 19, 2012 by <a href="http://www.harrisinteractive.com/" target="_blank">Harris Interactive </a>.</p>
<p>While a majority of all U.S. adults agree that Iran&#8217;s nuclear capabilities pose a threat to the United States this belief is stronger among older generations; 77%-79% of Baby Boomers (ages 48-66) and Matures (ages 67+) agree, compared to 63%-71% of Echo Boomers (ages 18-35) and Gen X (ages 36-47) who do.  The older generations are in similar agreement about the U.S. supporting Israel if Israel takes action against Iran&#8217;s nuclear program: over three in five Baby Boomers (63%) and Matures (68%) say the U.S. should support Israel, yet just 55% of Gen X and 45% of Echo Boomers respectively say the same.  There is a less strong opinion on whether Israel should take military action to destroy Iran&#8217;s nuclear capabilities.  Approximately half (47%-51%) of Gen X, Baby Boomers and Matures say Israel should, although just 38% of Echo Boomers agree.  If Americans are uncertain about how Israel should act, they are even more uncertain about what the U.S. should do:</p>
<ul>
<li>Overall 45% of U.S. adults agree that the United States should NOT take military action to destroy Iran&#8217;s nuclear program, 39% disagree and 16% are not at all sure;</li>
<li>Matures (aged 67+) are most likely to say that the U.S. should not take action against Iran and Gen X is least likely to say this (40%).</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Political Differences<br />
</strong>Military engagements and involvement with Israel are usually politically charged issues, but that sense is even more escalated in an election year. Republicans, Democrats and Independents show a different mind when considering Iran&#8217;s nuclear situation:</p>
<ul>
<li>While a majority of all political parties say that Iran&#8217;s nuclear capabilities pose a threat to the United States and that if Israel takes action against Iran the U.S. should support Israel, Republicans are the most likely to say these things (83% say Iran poses a threat and 70% want the U.S. to support Israel). Democrats and Independents agree that Iran poses a threat (70% and 73% say so respectively), yet these groups are less strongly in favor of supporting Israel taking action (51%-57% agree the U.S. should do so);</li>
<li>When asked directly if Israel should take military action against Iran&#8217;s nuclear program Republicans agree they should (59%), yet significantly fewer Democrats and Independents say the same (40% and 45%);</li>
<li>On the other hand, a majority of Democrats say that the U.S. should not take military action to destroy Iran&#8217;s nuclear program (52%), yet fewer than half of Independents (46%) and Republicans (37%) agree.</li>
</ul>
<p>Taking a more philosophical look, interestingly a majority of Americans &#8212; in all political parties &#8212; disagree that Iran has the right to continue working on its nuclear program (65%-71% of Republicans, Democrats and Independents say this).</p>
<p><strong>So What?<br />
</strong>Although most reports indicate that neither Israel nor the U.S. is likely to take immediate military action against Iran &#8211; the results of which could be enormous and costly &#8212; the continued discussion and analysis on what each country should do might have consequences of its own, particularly if Iran sees the ongoing discussion as provocation unto itself.  It will be interesting to see how President Obama handles the discussions and decisions moving forward &#8212; it seems unlikely that he would want to enter into a new military engagement, yet the potential threat from Iran is felt by Americans, the pro-Israel lobby is strong, and the U.S. demand for oil continues to be pervasive.</p>
<p><strong>Methodology<br />
</strong>This Harris Poll was conducted online within the United States between March 12 and 19, 2012 among 2,451 adults (aged 18 and over). Figures for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, region and household income were weighted where necessary to bring them into line with their actual proportions in the population. Propensity score weighting was also used to adjust for respondents&#8217; propensity to be online.</p>
<p>All sample surveys and polls, whether or not they use probability sampling, are subject to multiple sources of error which are most often not possible to quantify or estimate, including sampling error, coverage error, error associated with nonresponse, error associated with question wording and response options, and post-survey weighting and adjustments. Therefore, Harris Interactive avoids the words &#8220;margin of error&#8221; as they are misleading. All that can be calculated are different possible sampling errors with different probabilities for pure, unweighted, random samples with 100% response rates. These are only theoretical because no published polls come close to this ideal.</p>
<p>Respondents for this survey were selected from among those who have agreed to participate in Harris Interactive surveys. The data have been weighted to reflect the composition of the adult population. Because the sample is based on those who agreed to participate in the Harris Interactive panel, no estimates of theoretical sampling error can be calculated.</p>
<p>These statements conform to the principles of disclosure of the National Council on Public Polls.</p>
<p>The Harris Poll  #39, April 10, 2012<strong><br />
</strong>By Samantha Braverman, Sr. Project Researcher, Harris Interactive</p>
<p>Image Courtesey of  <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ari/" target="_blank">Steve Rhodes</a></p>
<p>The article <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/04/us-news/what-do-americans-think-about-irans-nuclear-threat/">What Do Americans Think About Iran&#8217;s Nuclear Threat?</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/04/us-news/what-do-americans-think-about-irans-nuclear-threat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Expedia American Traveler Survey: Travel Attitudes and Economic Impact</title>
		<link>http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/03/life-style/expedia-american-traveler-survey-travel-attitudes-and-economic-impact/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=expedia-american-traveler-survey-travel-attitudes-and-economic-impact</link>
		<comments>http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/03/life-style/expedia-american-traveler-survey-travel-attitudes-and-economic-impact/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 16:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TP Newswire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life Style]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american travel attitudes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Traveler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Traveler survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Expedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gateway Arch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Golden Gate Bridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grand Canyon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harris Interactive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independence Hall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Mall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Route 66]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statue of Liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Liberty Bell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[travel in America]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toonaripost.com/?p=37310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a></p><p>Expedia.com, the world&#8217;s leading online travel agency, released the results of a study of American attitudes in today&#8217;s economy as they relate to domestic travel, international travel, hotel selection criteria and social media. The American Traveler survey was conducted online within the United States by Harris Interactive on behalf of Expedia fromFebruary 16-20, 2012 among 2,262 adults ages 18 and older. [...]</p></p><p>The article <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/03/life-style/expedia-american-traveler-survey-travel-attitudes-and-economic-impact/">Expedia American Traveler Survey: Travel Attitudes and Economic Impact</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a></p><p>Expedia.com, the world&#8217;s leading online travel agency, released the results of a study of American attitudes in today&#8217;s economy as they relate to domestic travel, <a href="http://www.expedia.com/Flights" target="_blank">international travel</a>, <a href="http://www.expedia.com/Hotels" target="_blank">hotel</a> selection criteria and social media. The American Traveler survey was conducted online within the United States by Harris Interactive on behalf of Expedia fromFebruary 16-20, 2012 among 2,262 adults ages 18 and older.</p>
<p>Among other findings, it revealed that a full 41% of Americans – and nearly 1 in 2 men (49%) – have driven across the United States at one point. Just under one in four Americans (23%), and one in three students (31%) are &#8220;at least somewhat likely&#8221; to travel internationally in the next year.</p>
<p>Forty percent of Americans report the economic downturn over the past few years did not impact their personal/leisure travel. They &#8220;travel as usual,&#8221; particularly those between 35 and 44 years of age (46%). A percentage of young men (13%) and women (14%) aged 18 -34 are taking more trips these days, perhaps because a down economy prompts travel destinations to sweeten deals.</p>
<p>&#8220;This study, combined with our own data, tells us a lot about how Americans are traveling in today&#8217;s economy.  Our data shows that even though Americans are taking fewer flights, they are booking more hotel nights.  We believe that Americans are proving to be resilient in a down economy, by driving instead of flying and taking more frequent, shorter trips,&#8221; said Joe Megibow, vice president and general manager, Expedia.com.</p>
<p>&#8220;The study also showed how important friends and family were to the travel experience. Friends and family were the most important resource when choosing a hotel. Social networks are enabling new reach when seeking advice on travel, and we are thrilled to be able to help share that knowledge.&#8221;</p>
<p>Eighty-one percent of Americans have visited at least one of twelve major U.S. landmarks in their travels. Approximately one third of people have visited the National Mall in Washington DC, the Statue of Liberty, the Golden Gate Bridge and the Grand Canyon, while approximately one in four have visited the Gateway Arch in St. Louis, Route 66, the Liberty Bell, Independence Hall and the Alamo.</p>
<p><strong>Expedia&#8217;s American Traveler study also found that:</strong></p>
<p><strong>Social media keeps travelers connected.</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>75% of those who travel use social media.</li>
<ul>
<li>51% of those users do so to stay connected while on a trip regularly or periodically.</li>
<li>18 – 44 year olds are more likely than those aged 45 or older to use social media sites to connect with others during trip.</li>
</ul>
</ul>
<p><strong>For some American families, social media is connection enough.</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>12% of Americans say they are less likely to visit their family in person thanks to social media, while 25% say they are more likely to visit family in person.</li>
<li>Among those who use Feedback to connect with family members, younger adults aged 18 – 34 (22%) and those living in the West (22%) are significantly more likely to indicate that they are less likely to visit family.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>78% of Americans rely on reviews to provide direction when selecting a hotel.</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The primary review source is friends and family (51%).</li>
<ul>
<li>A slightly higher percentage cited friends (44%) than cited family (40%).</li>
</ul>
<li>The hotel&#8217;s own web site is the second-most important source of reviews (47%).</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Men are more likely to have ever driven cross-country than women (49% compared to 34%).</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Both genders still dream of the open road: 25% of men and 33% of women have &#8220;not done so but always wanted to&#8221; drive across the country.</li>
<li>Westerners are more adventurous, with 57% having made the cross-country vehicle journey, significantly higher than those in the Northeast (31%).</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>13% report having purchased travel via a &#8220;flash sale&#8221;.</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Young adults aged 18 -34 (24%) and those living in the West (21%) were most likely than their counterparts to have done so.</li>
</ul>
<p>The article <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/03/life-style/expedia-american-traveler-survey-travel-attitudes-and-economic-impact/">Expedia American Traveler Survey: Travel Attitudes and Economic Impact</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/03/life-style/expedia-american-traveler-survey-travel-attitudes-and-economic-impact/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans Are So Far Losing to President Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/02/us-news/republicans-are-so-far-losing-to-president-obama/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=republicans-are-so-far-losing-to-president-obama</link>
		<comments>http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/02/us-news/republicans-are-so-far-losing-to-president-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 12:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TP Newswire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harris Interactive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitt romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newt gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republican candidates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican primaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rick santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ron paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Harris Poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US presidential elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toonaripost.com/?p=34477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a></p><p>With about ten days to go before the next primaries in the Republican race for the nomination, all four remaining Republicans are losing to President Obama by between 8 and 17 points. As the race narrows down to the final candidate, just half of Americans (51%) say they are satisfied with the choices available to [...]</p></p><p>The article <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/02/us-news/republicans-are-so-far-losing-to-president-obama/">Republicans Are So Far Losing to President Obama</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a></p><p>With about ten days to go before the next primaries in the Republican race for the nomination, all four remaining Republicans are losing to President Obama by between 8 and 17 points. As the race narrows down to the final candidate, just half of Americans (51%) say they are satisfied with the choices available to them for President while more than two in five (44%) are not satisfied.</p>
<p>Independents are the most dissatisfied with over half (55%) saying they are not satisfied with the choices while two-thirds of Democrats (68%) are satisfied. Republicans are more split as half are satisfied (52%) and 44% are not satisfied. But the Republican satisfaction is soft with just 13% very satisfied and 39% saying they are only somewhat satisfied. These are some of the results of The Harris Poll<strong> </strong>of 2,056 adults surveyed online between February 6 and 13, 2012 by <a href="http://www.harrisinteractive.com/" target="_blank"><strong>Harris Interactive</strong> </a></p>
<p><strong>Head to head match-ups</strong></p>
<p>If the presidential election were held today, 46% of Americans would vote for President Obama, 37% would vote for Mitt Romney and 17% are not at all sure. Last month, two in five U.S. adults (43%) said they would vote for President Obama while 39% said they would vote for Mitt Romney.</p>
<p>Among Independents, it&#8217;s a slightly closer race with 43% voting for the President and 37% voting for the former governor and 46% of adults in the 2012 Swing States (Colorado, Florida, Indiana, Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, and Virginia) would vote for President Obama and 39% would vote for Mitt Romney.</p>
<p>Ron Paul may not be in the fight for front-runner, but he actually makes it a slightly tighter race as 45% of Americans would vote for President Obama and 37% would vote for the Congressman while 18% are not at all sure. Among Independents, Paul is ahead 42% to the President&#8217;s 40% but in the 2012 Swing States the President is ahead 45% to 41% for Paul.</p>
<p>He may be jockeying for front-runner status but the former Senator from Pennsylvania is more than ten points behind the President. Almost half of Americans would vote for President Obama (47%) while 35% would vote for Rick Santorum and 18% are not at all sure. Among Independents, 44% would vote for President Obama and 35% for Santorum with 20% not at all sure. In the 2012 Swing states, 46% would vote for the President while 40% would vote for Santorum.</p>
<p>Finally, if the election was held today, half of Americans (50%) would vote for President Obama and one-third for Newt Gingrich (33%) with 18% not at all sure. Among Independents, President Obama leads Newt Gingrich 47% to 32% with 20% not at all sure and among people in the 2012 Swing states President Obama leads Newt Gingrich 48% to 36% with 16% not at all sure.</p>
<p><strong>So What?</strong></p>
<p>The Republican primary continues to be a road full of twists and turns and the main benefactor to these constant changing stories is President Obama. In each of these four races the President has expanded his lead. The question is what happens when the primary race is over and the Republicans have decided on a candidate. If that happens quickly, he will have time to make the race close, but the longer the primary goes, the shorter the general election timeframe becomes.</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="7" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">TABLE 1<br />
ROMNEY VS. OBAMA<br />
&#8220;If the presidential election were held today and these were the two candidates, for whom would you most likely vote?&#8221;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="7" valign="bottom">Base: All adults</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Oct</p>
</td>
<td colspan="2" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Nov</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Dec</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Jan</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Feb</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td colspan="2" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Barack Obama</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">41</p>
</td>
<td colspan="2" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">41</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">43</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">43</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">46</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Mitt Romney</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">40</p>
</td>
<td colspan="2" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">41</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">40</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">39</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">37</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Not at all sure</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">18</p>
</td>
<td colspan="2" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">18</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">17</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">19</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">17</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" valign="bottom">Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="287"></td>
<td width="97"></td>
<td width="22"></td>
<td width="22"></td>
<td width="109"></td>
<td width="104"></td>
<td width="106"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="9" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">TABLE 2<br />
ROMNEY VS. OBAMA – By Party and Political Philosophy<br />
&#8220;If the presidential election were held today and these were the two candidates, for whom would you most likely vote?&#8221;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="9" valign="bottom">Base: All adults</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="3" valign="bottom"></td>
<td rowspan="2" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Total</p>
</td>
<td rowspan="2" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">2012 Swing state</p>
</td>
<td colspan="3" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Party ID</p>
</td>
<td colspan="3" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Political Philosophy</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Rep.</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Dem.</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Ind.</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Cons.</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Mod.</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Lib.</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Barack Obama</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">46</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">46</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">9</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">84</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">43</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">19</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">51</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">78</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Mitt Romney</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">37</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">39</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">77</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">7</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">37</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">64</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">30</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">10</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Not at all sure</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">17</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">15</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">14</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">9</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">20</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">16</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">19</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">12</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="9" valign="bottom">Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding; 2012 Swing States are Colorado, Florida, Indiana, Iowa, Nevada,<br />
New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio and Virginia</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="11" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">TABLE 3<br />
GINGRICH VS OBAMA<strong><br />
</strong>&#8220;If the presidential election were held today and these were the two candidates, for whom would you most likely vote?&#8221;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="11" valign="bottom">Base: All adults</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="3" valign="bottom"></td>
<td rowspan="2" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Total</p>
<p align="center">Dec</p>
</td>
<td rowspan="2" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Total</p>
<p align="center">Jan</p>
</td>
<td rowspan="2" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Total</p>
<p align="center">Feb</p>
</td>
<td rowspan="2" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">2012</p>
<p align="center">Swing</p>
<p align="center">States</p>
</td>
<td colspan="3" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Party ID</p>
</td>
<td colspan="3" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Political Philosophy</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Rep.</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Dem.</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Ind.</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Cons.</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Mod.</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Lib.</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Barack Obama</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">45</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">45</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">50</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">48</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">12</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">87</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">47</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">19</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">56</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">83</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Newt Gingrich</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">38</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">36</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">33</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">36</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">72</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">6</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">32</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">63</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">24</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">6</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Not at all sure</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">17</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">19</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">18</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">16</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">16</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">7</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">20</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">18</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">20</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">12</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="11" valign="bottom">Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding; 2012 Swing States are Colorado, Florida, Indiana, Iowa, Nevada,<br />
New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio and Virginia</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="12" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">TABLE 4<br />
PAUL VS. OBAMA<strong><br />
</strong>&#8220;If the presidential election were held today and these were the two candidates, for whom would you most likely vote?&#8221;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="12" valign="bottom">Base: All adults</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="3" valign="bottom"></td>
<td rowspan="2" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Total Oct</p>
</td>
<td rowspan="2" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Total Nov</p>
</td>
<td rowspan="2" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Total</p>
<p align="center">Jan</p>
</td>
<td rowspan="2" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Total</p>
<p align="center">Feb</p>
</td>
<td rowspan="2" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">2012</p>
<p align="center">Swing</p>
<p align="center">States</p>
</td>
<td colspan="3" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Party ID</p>
</td>
<td colspan="3" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Political Philosophy</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Rep</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Dem</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Ind</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Cons</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Mod</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Lib</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Barack Obama</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">41</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">40</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">42</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">45</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">45</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">10</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">84</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">40</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">20</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">50</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">74</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Ron Paul</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">36</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">38</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">38</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">37</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">41</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">71</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">8</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">42</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">61</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">31</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">14</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Not at all sure</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">23</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">21</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">20</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">18</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">15</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">19</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">9</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">18</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">19</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">19</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">12</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="12" valign="bottom">Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding; 2012 Swing States are Colorado, Florida, Indiana, Iowa, Nevada,<br />
New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio and Virginia</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="10" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">TABLE 5<br />
SANTORUM VS. OBAMA<br />
&#8220;If the presidential election were held today and these were the two candidates, for whom would you most likely vote?&#8221;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="10" valign="bottom">Base: All adults</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="3" valign="bottom"></td>
<td rowspan="2" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Total</p>
<p align="center">Jan</p>
</td>
<td rowspan="2" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Total</p>
<p align="center">Feb</p>
</td>
<td rowspan="2" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">2012</p>
<p align="center">Swing</p>
<p align="center">States</p>
</td>
<td colspan="3" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Party ID</p>
</td>
<td colspan="3" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Philosophy</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Rep.</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Dem.</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Ind.</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Cons.</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Mod.</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Lib.</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Barack Obama</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">45</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">47</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">46</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">10</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">85</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">44</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">18</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">54</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">78</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Rick Santorum</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">36</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">35</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">40</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">74</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">6</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">35</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">67</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">25</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">7</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Not at all sure</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">19</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">18</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">14</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">16</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">8</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">20</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">15</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">21</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">14</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="10" valign="bottom">Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding; 2012 Swing States are Colorado, Florida, Indiana, Iowa, Nevada,<br />
New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio and Virginia</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="10" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">TABLE 6<br />
SATISFACTION WITH CANDIDATE CHOICES<strong><br />
</strong>&#8220;How satisfied are you with the choices available to you for President?&#8221;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="10" valign="bottom">Base: All adults</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="3" valign="bottom"></td>
<td rowspan="2" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Total</p>
</td>
<td rowspan="2" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Tea</p>
<p align="center"> Party<br />
Supporter</p>
</td>
<td rowspan="2" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">2012</p>
<p align="center">Swing</p>
<p align="center">States</p>
</td>
<td colspan="3" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Party ID</p>
</td>
<td colspan="3" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Philosophy</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Rep</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Dem</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Ind</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Cons</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Mod</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Lib</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">SATISFIED (NET)</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">51</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">51</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">55</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">52</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">68</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">42</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">50</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">49</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">61</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">  Very Satisfied</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">19</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">12</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">25</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">13</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">35</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">12</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">16</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">17</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">31</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">  Somewhat satisfied</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">32</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">39</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">30</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">39</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">33</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">30</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">34</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">32</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">30</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">NOT SATISFIED (NET)</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">44</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">48</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">41</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">44</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">29</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">55</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">47</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">46</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">34</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">  Not very satisfied</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">28</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">34</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">27</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">32</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">18</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">34</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">32</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">28</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">20</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">  Not at all satisfied</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">16</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">14</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">14</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">12</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">11</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">21</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">15</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">18</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">14</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Not at all sure</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">5</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">1</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">4</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">4</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">3</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">3</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">4</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">6</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">5</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="10" valign="bottom">Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding; 2012 Swing States are Colorado, Florida, Indiana, Iowa, Nevada,<br />
New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio and Virginia</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>Methodology</strong></p>
<p>This Harris Poll was conducted online within the United States between January 25 and 27, 2012 among 2,099 adults (aged 18 and over). Figures for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, region and household income were weighted where necessary to bring them into line with their actual proportions in the population. Propensity score weighting was also used to adjust for respondents&#8217; propensity to be online.</p>
<p>All sample surveys and polls, whether or not they use probability sampling, are subject to multiple sources of error which are most often not possible to quantify or estimate, including sampling error, coverage error, error associated with nonresponse, error associated with question wording and response options, and post-survey weighting and adjustments.</p>
<p>Therefore, Harris Interactive avoids the words &#8220;margin of error&#8221; as they are misleading. All that can be calculated are different possible sampling errors with different probabilities for pure, unweighted, random samples with 100% response rates. These are only theoretical because no published polls come close to this ideal.</p>
<p>Respondents for this survey were selected from among those who have agreed to participate in Harris Interactive surveys. The data have been weighted to reflect the composition of the adult population. Because the sample is based on those who agreed to participate in the Harris Interactive panel, no estimates of theoretical sampling error can be calculated.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Image Courtesy of   <a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/gallery-50543p1.html?cr=00&amp;pl=edit-00">Jose Gil</a> / <a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/?cr=00&amp;pl=edit-00" target="_blank">Shutterstock.com</a></p>
<p>The article <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/02/us-news/republicans-are-so-far-losing-to-president-obama/">Republicans Are So Far Losing to President Obama</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/02/us-news/republicans-are-so-far-losing-to-president-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Media Has Made Teens Aware of the Needs of Others</title>
		<link>http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/02/life-style/social-media-has-made-teens-aware-of-the-needs-of-others/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=social-media-has-made-teens-aware-of-the-needs-of-others</link>
		<comments>http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/02/life-style/social-media-has-made-teens-aware-of-the-needs-of-others/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 18:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TP Newswire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life Style]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy & Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fight world hunger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haiti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harris Interactive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeless children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hunger awareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Tvedt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regina Corson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soup kitchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teens social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world hunger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Vision]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toonaripost.com/?p=34106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a></p><p>According to a new 30 Hour Famine study, conducted online in January by Harris Interactive, more than half of teens (55%) say social media sites like Facebook and Twitter have made them more aware of the needs of others. This is a huge increase from 2011 when a little more 4 in 10 (44%) said [...]</p></p><p>The article <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/02/life-style/social-media-has-made-teens-aware-of-the-needs-of-others/">Social Media Has Made Teens Aware of the Needs of Others</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a></p><p>According to a new 30 Hour Famine study, conducted online in January by Harris Interactive, more than half of teens (55%) say social media sites like Facebook and Twitter have made them more aware of the needs of others. This is a huge increase from 2011 when a little more 4 in 10 (44%) said their use of social media made them more aware. The study also says 2 in 3 teens (68%) agree that the benefits of social media outweigh the risks.</p>
<p>According to the study, more than nine out of ten (91%) agree that it&#8217;s important to volunteer locally. At the end of this month, some 200,000 teens will go hungry as part of World Vision&#8217;s 30 Hour Famine to raise funds and hunger awareness. Since 1992, 30 Hour Famine has raised more than $150 million to fight world hunger. This is the fourth year World Vision has surveyed American youth to get a better idea of what they&#8217;re thinking. 30 Hour Famine has close to 30,000 Facebook friends.</p>
<p>&#8220;The jump in the number of teens who say social media sites make them more socially aware is a sign of the times,&#8221; says Regina Corson, Senior Vice President, Harris Poll, Public Relations and Youth Research at Harris Interactive. Michele Tvedt, World Vision&#8217;s 30 Hour Famine Manager says, &#8220;It&#8217;s exciting to see our youth using the tools at their fingertips like social media to have a direct impact on the world.&#8221; Tvedt has personally done The Famine for 13 years, adding up to more than 390 hours over the years.</p>
<p>While many teens will do 30 Hour Famine in late February, others will participate April 27th, 28th<sup>.</sup> Teens forsake food for 30 hours to get a taste of what the world&#8217;s poorest children face. Prior to the event, teens raise funds by explaining that $1 can help feed and care for a child a day. Teens consume only water and juice as they participate in local community service projects (food banks, soup kitchens and homeless shelters). Last year&#8217;s 30 Hour Famine raised $9.5 million to fight hunger. This year&#8217;s goal is $10 million.</p>
<p>Tonight, almost 1 billion people worldwide will go to bed hungry. Almost 22,000 children die each day from hunger and preventable diseases. Chronic poverty, affecting half the people on earth, is the cause. Nearly 3 billion people live on less than $2 a day. Funds raised this year for 30 Hour Famine will be sent to 10 countries including Haiti, the Horn of Africa, Burundi, Malawi, Pakistan and Afghanistan. Some 30 Hour Famine funds also address poverty here in the U.S.</p>
<p>The article <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/02/life-style/social-media-has-made-teens-aware-of-the-needs-of-others/">Social Media Has Made Teens Aware of the Needs of Others</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/02/life-style/social-media-has-made-teens-aware-of-the-needs-of-others/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Harris Poll of President Obama&#8217;s Performance Shows Mixed Feelings</title>
		<link>http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/02/us-news/the-harris-poll-of-president-obamas-performance-shows-mixed-feelings/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-harris-poll-of-president-obamas-performance-shows-mixed-feelings</link>
		<comments>http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/02/us-news/the-harris-poll-of-president-obamas-performance-shows-mixed-feelings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TP Newswire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harris Interactive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harris Poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama job]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strongly agree]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveys and polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toonaripost.com/?p=32387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a></p><p>As President Obama starts his fourth year in office, people have many opinions of the job he has done so far and these opinions have changed over the past three years. In looking at fourteen different statements there are three that have changed fairly substantially over time. In 2010, almost three in five Americans (57%) [...]</p></p><p>The article <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/02/us-news/the-harris-poll-of-president-obamas-performance-shows-mixed-feelings/">The Harris Poll of President Obama&#8217;s Performance Shows Mixed Feelings</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a></p><p>As President Obama starts his fourth year in office, people have many opinions of the job he has done so far and these opinions have changed over the past three years. In looking at fourteen different statements there are three that have changed fairly substantially over time.</p>
<p>In 2010, almost three in five Americans (57%) said President Obama made other countries feel better about the United States. That number dropped to 50% last year and is now even lower, at 43% this year.</p>
<p>Over half of U.S. adults (55%) agree that President Obama is not changing things fast enough and in 2010, 43% felt that way. Another large shift is in the speed of change. In 2010, less than two in five (38%) agreed the President was changing things too fast; this year one-quarter of Americans (26%) feel this way.</p>
<p>These are some of the results of The Harris Poll<strong> </strong>of 2,016 adults surveyed online between January 16 and 23, 2012 by <a href="http://www.harrisinteractive.com/" target="_blank"><strong>Harris Interactive</strong> </a>.</p>
<p>Looking at some of the more positive statements, each shows a decline in the number of Americans who agree. While majorities believe that the President is trying to put the country back on track (57%), trying to bring about much needed change (54%) and is open, honest and trustworthy (50%), two years ago, in 2010 between 54% and 61% agreed with each statement and in 2011 between 53% and 59% agreed.</p>
<p>Looking at some of the more negative statements, more than three in five Americans say President Obama has not lived up to his campaign promises (63% up from 56% who said this last year) and that he spends too much time talking and there isn&#8217;t enough action (61% up from 56%). In 2010, three in five U.S. adults (61%) believed the President hadn&#8217;t done much for them yet and that dropped to 56% last year but is back up to 58% this year.</p>
<p>Other findings of this poll include:</p>
<ul>
<li>A few things haven&#8217;t changed too much since last year. About half of Americans agree President Obama does a good job of explaining issues to people (49%) and that he is working for the people&#8217;s best interests and doing the right thing (49%);</li>
<li>Less than half of Americans (47%) believe the President provides a fresh outlook with new ideas, down from 52% last year and 56% in 2010;</li>
<li>Three in five Americans (59%) say the President is spending too much and creating too much debt, which is down from 61% who said this in 2010 and up from 56% who agreed in 2011; and,</li>
<li>Up from 41% last year, this year 45% of U.S. adults say President Obama doesn&#8217;t care about people like them.</li>
</ul>
<p>Partisan Differences</p>
<p>As it has been in the past two years, it is not surprising that Democrats agree with more of the positive statements about the President, and Republicans agree with more of the negative ones.  There are, however, a few interesting similarities that came out in the data. For example:</p>
<ul>
<li>Majorities of Republicans (52%), Democrats (55%) and Independents (59%) say President Obama is not changing things fast enough;</li>
<li>But, at the same time, two in five Republicans (40%), one-quarter of Independents (24%) and 14% of Democrats say the President is changing things too fast; and,</li>
<li>While four in five Republicans (82%) and almost two-thirds of Independents (64%) say President Obama has not lived up to his campaign promises, so do almost half of Democrats (48%).</li>
</ul>
<p>So What?</p>
<p>President Obama has had a complicated year. The economic indicators are improving, but Americans are only slowly coming around to that. He&#8217;s had some big national security wins, but with the focus on the economy and jobs, the President is not getting a lot of credit.</p>
<p>And, there is also the focus on the Republican candidates vying to challenge the President in the fall. All of this is something President Obama has to contend with and could help explain why Americans are a little conflicted about their feelings towards him at the moment. He has some time before he has to convince the American public to re-elect him, but in order to do that he will need to work diligently to alter some of these views.</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="8" valign="bottom" width="639">
<p align="center">TABLE 1<br />
POSITIVE STATEMENTS ABOUT PRESIDENT OBAMA<strong><br />
</strong>&#8220;Do you agree or disagree with the following statements about President Obama?&#8221;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="8" valign="bottom" width="639">Base: All adults</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" valign="bottom" width="96"></td>
<td valign="bottom" width="79">
<p align="center">AGREE</p>
<p align="center">(NET)</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="64">
<p align="center">Strongly</p>
<p align="center">agree</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="89">
<p align="center">Somewhat</p>
<p align="center">agree</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="97">
<p align="center">DISAGREE</p>
<p align="center">(NET)</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="89">
<p align="center">Somewhat</p>
<p align="center">disagree</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="75">
<p align="center">Strongly</p>
<p align="center">disagree</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="48">
<p align="center">Not</p>
<p align="center">Sure</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" width="79">
<p align="center"><strong>%</strong></p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="64">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="89">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="97">
<p align="center"><strong>%</strong></p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="89">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="75">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="48">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" width="96">He is trying to put the country back on track.</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="79">
<p align="center">57</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="64">
<p align="center">32</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="89">
<p align="center">25</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="97">
<p align="center">38</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="89">
<p align="center">11</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="75">
<p align="center">27</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="48">
<p align="center">5</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" width="96">He is trying to bring about much needed change.</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="79">
<p align="center">54</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="64">
<p align="center">28</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="89">
<p align="center">26</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="97">
<p align="center">39</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="89">
<p align="center">13</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="75">
<p align="center">27</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="48">
<p align="center">7</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" width="96">He is open, honest and trustworthy.</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="79">
<p align="center">50</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="64">
<p align="center">26</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="89">
<p align="center">24</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="97">
<p align="center">42</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="89">
<p align="center">14</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="75">
<p align="center">29</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="48">
<p align="center">8</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" width="96">He does a good job of explaining issues to people like me.</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="79">
<p align="center">49</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="64">
<p align="center">22</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="89">
<p align="center">27</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="97">
<p align="center">45</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="89">
<p align="center">17</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="75">
<p align="center">27</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="48">
<p align="center">7</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" width="96">He is working for the people&#8217;s best interests and doing the right thing.</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="79">
<p align="center">49</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="64">
<p align="center">24</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="89">
<p align="center">25</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="97">
<p align="center">45</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="89">
<p align="center">13</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="75">
<p align="center">32</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="48">
<p align="center">6</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" width="96">He provides a fresh outlook with new ideas.</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="79">
<p align="center">47</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="64">
<p align="center">18</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="89">
<p align="center">29</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="97">
<p align="center">46</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="89">
<p align="center">17</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="75">
<p align="center">30</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="48">
<p align="center">7</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" width="96">He has made other countries feel better about the United States.</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="79">
<p align="center">43</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="64">
<p align="center">18</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="89">
<p align="center">25</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="97">
<p align="center">45</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="89">
<p align="center">16</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="75">
<p align="center">29</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="48">
<p align="center">12</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="8" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">TABLE 2<br />
NEGATIVE STATEMENTS ABOUT PRESIDENT OBAMA<strong><br />
</strong>&#8220;Do you agree or disagree with the following statements about President Obama?&#8221;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="8" valign="bottom">Base: All adults</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" valign="bottom"></td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">AGREE</p>
<p align="center">(NET)</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Strongly</p>
<p align="center">agree</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Somewhat</p>
<p align="center">agree</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">DISAGREE</p>
<p align="center">(NET)</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Somewhat</p>
<p align="center">disagree</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Strongly</p>
<p align="center">disagree</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Not</p>
<p align="center">Sure</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>%</strong></p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>%</strong></p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">He has not lived up to his campaign promises.</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">63</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">36</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">27</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">30</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">16</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">14</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">7</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">He spends too much time talking and there isn&#8217;t enough action.</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">61</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">37</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">23</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">33</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">18</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">14</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">7</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">He is spending too much and creating too much debt.</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">59</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">41</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">18</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">34</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">18</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">16</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">8</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">He hasn&#8217;t done much for us yet.</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">58</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">35</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">22</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">37</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">19</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">18</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">5</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">He is not changing things fast enough.</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">55</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">24</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">31</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">36</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">19</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">17</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">9</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">He doesn&#8217;t care about people like me.</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">45</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">30</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">15</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">49</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">19</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">30</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">6</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">He is changing things too fast.</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">26</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">15</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">11</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">66</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">29</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">37</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">8</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="7" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">TABLE 3<br />
POSITIVE STATEMENTS ABOUT PRESIDENT OBAMA – BY PARTY<strong><br />
</strong>&#8220;Do you agree or disagree with the following statements about President Obama?&#8221;<br />
<em>Percentage saying &#8220;Strongly/Somewhat agree&#8221;</em></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="7" valign="bottom">Base: All adults</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="3" valign="bottom"></td>
<td rowspan="2" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Jan.</p>
<p align="center">2010</p>
</td>
<td rowspan="2" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Jan.</p>
<p align="center">2011</p>
</td>
<td rowspan="2" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Jan.</p>
<p align="center">2012</p>
</td>
<td colspan="3" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Political Party</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Republican</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Democrat</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Independent</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">He is trying to put the country back on track.</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">61</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">59</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">57</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">23</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">84</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">59</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">He is trying to bring about much needed change.</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">60</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">58</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">54</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">23</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">83</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">53</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">He is open, honest and trustworthy.</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">54</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">53</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">50</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">18</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">79</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">51</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">He does a good job of explaining issues to people like me.</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">NA</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">51</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">49</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">18</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">80</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">48</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">He is working for the people&#8217;s best interests and doing the right thing.</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">51</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">51</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">49</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">15</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">81</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">49</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">He provides a fresh outlook with new ideas.</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">56</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">52</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">47</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">18</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">75</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">44</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">He has made other countries feel better about the United States.</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">57</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">50</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">43</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">14</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">71</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">43</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding; NA indicates not asked in that year</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="7" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">TABLE 4<br />
NEGATIVE STATEMENTS ABOUT PRESIDENT OBAMA – BY PARTY<strong><br />
</strong>&#8220;Do you agree or disagree with the following statements about President Obama?&#8221;<br />
<em>Percentage saying &#8220;Strongly/Somewhat agree&#8221;</em></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="7" valign="bottom">Base: All adults</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="3" valign="bottom"></td>
<td rowspan="2" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Jan.</p>
<p align="center">2010</p>
</td>
<td rowspan="2" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Jan.</p>
<p align="center">2011</p>
</td>
<td rowspan="2" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Jan.</p>
<p align="center">2012</p>
</td>
<td colspan="3" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Political Party</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Republican</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Democrat</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">Independent</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">%</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">He has not lived up to his campaign promises.</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">60</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">56</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">63</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">82</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">48</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">64</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">He spends too much time talking and there isn&#8217;t enough action.</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">57</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">56</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">61</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">82</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">41</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">61</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">He is spending too much and creating too much debt.</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">61</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">56</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">59</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">87</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">34</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">59</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">He hasn&#8217;t done much for us yet.</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">61</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">53</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">58</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">83</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">35</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">60</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">He is not changing things fast enough.</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">43</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">45</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">55</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">52</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">55</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">59</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">He doesn&#8217;t care about people like me.</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">NA</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">41</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">45</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">73</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">21</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">44</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">He is changing things too fast.</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">38</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">33</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">26</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">40</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">14</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<p align="center">24</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding; NA indicates not asked in that year</p>
<p>Methodology</p>
<p>This Harris Poll was conducted online within the United States between January 16 to 23, 2012 among 2,016 adults (aged 18 and over). Figures for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, region and household income were weighted where necessary to bring them into line with their actual proportions in the population. Propensity score weighting was also used to adjust for respondents&#8217; propensity to be online.</p>
<p>All sample surveys and polls, whether or not they use probability sampling, are subject to multiple sources of error which are most often not possible to quantify or estimate, including sampling error, coverage error, error associated with non response, error associated with question wording and response options, and post-survey weighting and adjustments.</p>
<p>Therefore, Harris Interactive avoids the words &#8220;margin of error&#8221; as they are misleading. All that can be calculated are different possible sampling errors with different probabilities for pure, unweighted, random samples with 100% response rates. These are only theoretical because no published polls come close to this ideal.</p>
<p>Respondents for this survey were selected from among those who have agreed to participate in Harris Interactive surveys. The data have been weighted to reflect the composition of the adult population. Because the sample is based on those who agreed to participate in the Harris Interactive panel, no estimates of theoretical sampling error can be calculated.</p>
<p>The article <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/02/us-news/the-harris-poll-of-president-obamas-performance-shows-mixed-feelings/">The Harris Poll of President Obama&#8217;s Performance Shows Mixed Feelings</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/02/us-news/the-harris-poll-of-president-obamas-performance-shows-mixed-feelings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poor Hygiene Named the Top Deal Breaker on a Date</title>
		<link>http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/02/life-style/poor-hygiene-named-the-top-deal-breaker-on-a-date/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=poor-hygiene-named-the-top-deal-breaker-on-a-date</link>
		<comments>http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/02/life-style/poor-hygiene-named-the-top-deal-breaker-on-a-date/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TP Newswire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life Style]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy & Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CouponCabin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[date etiquette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dating advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[February 14 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first dates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harris Interactive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jackie Warrick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal hygiene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poor hygiene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relationship advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US adults]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valentine's Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valentine's Gift exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valentines day 2012]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toonaripost.com/?p=32219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a></p><p>Cupid&#8217;s arrows are ready to fly this Valentine&#8217;s Day, but a new survey reveals that some daters would benefit from dating etiquette classes. The survey, conducted by coupon site CouponCabin.com,reveals the biggest dating deal breakers, with poor hygiene, (e.g. body odor, bad teeth, and dirty hair) topping the list. This survey was conducted online within the United [...]</p></p><p>The article <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/02/life-style/poor-hygiene-named-the-top-deal-breaker-on-a-date/">Poor Hygiene Named the Top Deal Breaker on a Date</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a></p><p>Cupid&#8217;s arrows are ready to fly this Valentine&#8217;s Day, but a new survey reveals that some daters would benefit from dating etiquette classes. The survey, conducted by coupon site <a href="http://www.couponcabin.com/?s_altid=www.google.it" target="_blank">CouponCabin.com</a>,reveals the biggest dating deal breakers, with poor hygiene, (e.g. body odor, bad teeth, and dirty hair) topping the list.</p>
<p>This survey was conducted online within the United States by Harris Interactive on behalf of CouponCabin from January 17th -19th, 2012 among 2,415 U.S. adults ages 18 and older.</p>
<p>While poor hygiene is the biggest dating deal breaker with 84 percent of U.S. adults, a variety of other dating missteps made the list:</p>
<ul>
<li>Using their mobile phone too much; constantly texting, checking email – 75 percent</li>
<li>Being rude to a server or host/hostess – 73 percent</li>
<li>Talking too much about an ex – 70 percent</li>
<li>Flirting with the server or host/hostess – 61 percent</li>
<li>Date drinking too much alcohol – 60 percent</li>
<li>Aggressive driving – 49 percent</li>
<li>Not offering to pay for the whole date, or at least to pay for their share – 33 percent</li>
<li>Being too expensive of a date (e.g. ordering the most costly food and drink) – 31 percent</li>
<li>Talking about a potential long-term future together – 30 percent</li>
<li>Using websites or social media (e.g. Facebook) to find out information before the date – 26 percent</li>
</ul>
<p>Women were significantly more likely than men to consider dating offenses deal breakers, in every case aside from being too expensive of a date, wherein men were significantly more likely (34 percent) to say that it was a deal breaker than women (28 percent).</p>
<p>The biggest discrepancies in opinion on what constitutes a deal breaker between women and men were for using a mobile phone too much during a date, at 82 percent and 68 percent, respectively, and being rude to a server or host/hostess, at 80 percent and 65 percent, respectively.</p>
<p>&#8220;Dating can have many hurdles, but don&#8217;t let the money issues get in the way of a potential love connection,&#8221; said Jackie Warrick, President and Chief Savings Officer at CouponCabin.com. &#8220;Many modern daters often offer to at least pay part of their share, and if not, are cognizant and order moderately priced items.</p>
<p>No matter what the situation, though, daters should strive for politeness and tact, especially when making that critical first impression.&#8221; First impressions aren&#8217;t the only difficult part of dating. Selecting the right Valentine&#8217;s Day gift can also be challenging ground in the land of courtship. When asked what was the worst Valentine&#8217;s Day gifts they&#8217;ve ever received, U.S. adults said the following:</p>
<ul>
<li>Bathroom scale</li>
<li>Birthday card. Valentine&#8217;s Day is not my birthday.</li>
<li>Pooper-scooper</li>
<li>Dead butterfly mounted in a plastic case. It was our second date.</li>
<li>Break-up text</li>
<li>Card stating a donation was made in my name for a charity I don&#8217;t support.</li>
<li>Laundry basket</li>
<li>Pair of silk boxers that had someone else&#8217;s name on the gift tag.</li>
<li>Stuffed animal that looked like it was won out of one of those claw games.</li>
<li>Electric can opener</li>
<li>Lottery tickets</li>
<li>Tupperware</li>
<li>Snowshoes</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The article <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/02/life-style/poor-hygiene-named-the-top-deal-breaker-on-a-date/">Poor Hygiene Named the Top Deal Breaker on a Date</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/02/life-style/poor-hygiene-named-the-top-deal-breaker-on-a-date/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Slight Improvement in American Local Job Markets</title>
		<link>http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/02/us-news/slight-improvement-in-american-local-job-markets/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=slight-improvement-in-american-local-job-markets</link>
		<comments>http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/02/us-news/slight-improvement-in-american-local-job-markets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TP Newswire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american local job market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy influences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harris Interactive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Harris Poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US job market]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toonaripost.com/?p=30946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><p><a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a></p><p>In the current political environment the job market continues to be one of the more important topics.  And, for the first time in months, Americans are indicating that the job market in their region of the country may be improving, albeit slightly. In January 2012 14% of U.S. adults said that the job market in [...]</p></p><p>The article <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/02/us-news/slight-improvement-in-american-local-job-markets/">Slight Improvement in American Local Job Markets</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a></p><p>In the current political environment the job market continues to be one of the more important topics.  And, for the first time in months, Americans are indicating that the job market in their region of the country may be improving, albeit slightly.</p>
<p>In January 2012 14% of U.S. adults said that the job market in their region of the country is good, which is up from 9% who said so in October 2011, 11% who said so in September and 12% who said so two months earlier in July 2011.  The number of Americans who call the job market in their region bad has also dropped this month, to 65%, down from 67% who said so in October 2011.</p>
<p>These are some of the results of The Harris Poll of 2,016 adults surveyed online between January 16 and 23, 2012 by Harris Interactive .Although these numbers are still low overall, with almost two thirds calling the job market in their region bad (65%) and one in five saying it&#8217;s neither good nor bad (21%), a minor increase is important, and may be reflective of real change.</p>
<p>Looking across the country it appears that the job markets in the East and South are the best, as 15% and 16% in those regions respectively say that the market there is good, while the Midwest and West may be struggling more—over two thirds in the Midwest (67%) and West (71%) call the job market in their region bad.</p>
<p>Further evidence that the national job market may be improving is the response seen when Americans were asked how they think the job market in their region will change over the next 6 months.  For the first time since March 2011 more people say that the job market in their region will be better—27% say so now, compared to 22% in July.  While this number shows an increase, it&#8217;s still lower than the three in ten who expected the job market to improve when asked during the first half of 2011 (30%-32% said so between January and May 2011).</p>
<p>Looking by political party there are stark differences in attitudes regarding the future of the job market—Democrats show significantly more optimism than do either Independents or Republicans.</p>
<p>Fully two in five Democrats expect that the job market will improve over the next 6 months (41%) compared to 24% of Independents and only 14% of Republicans who say the same.  Republicans and Independents are most likely to say that they think the job market will stay the same (56% and 55%).</p>
<p>This optimism about the job market may be related to perceived blame for the state of the economy.  When asked how much each of the following groups are to blame for their financial situation, a large majority of Republicans (84%) and over half of Independents (55%) say they blame the President.  This compares to fewer than one third of Democrats who say the same (30%).  When asked about other groups&#8217; blame for the current financial situation some of the results include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Large majorities of Americans say they blame Congress (81%) and Wall Street (70%) for their financial situation;</li>
<li>Two thirds say they blame large corporations (66%), fewer say they blame state government (62%) or the President (56%) and less than half say they blame local government (48%).</li>
</ul>
<p>Similarly to how partisan differences may account for how much someone blames the President for their financial situation, Democrats are also significantly less likely than both Republicans and Independents to give President Obama negative ratings on his handling of the economy.</p>
<p>Overall one quarter of Americans say President Obama&#8217;s handling of the economy is excellent or very good (25%) while three quarters say it is only fair or poor (75%).  These numbers are unchanged since December 2011 despite the other improvements seen in perceptions of the job market.</p>
<p>The article <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/02/us-news/slight-improvement-in-american-local-job-markets/">Slight Improvement in American Local Job Markets</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.toonaripost.com">The Toonari Post - News, Powered by the People!</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.toonaripost.com/2012/02/us-news/slight-improvement-in-american-local-job-markets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
